Your 2024 Predictions, Part Three: Fifteen with Wanda.

And so it goes on, our look back at your predictions for The Comic Industry in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty and Four, with parts one and two at those links right there.

And yes, get in those predictions for 2025 before too much more 2025 goes by!

• • •

googum, as is his wont, googums

“1. Marvel’s going to try to pivot from Kang, to Ravonna. As long as they don’t try to use the name ‘Terminatrix’ it’ll probably be fine.”

Kang is definitely out in the Marvel movies, given the troubles with the actor, and the simple fact Kang wasn’t getting the Big Villain traction Thanos did. Essentially replaced by Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom, and that Avengers movie that would have been called “The Kang Dynasty” is now “Doomsday.” So there.

“2. They’ll also give up on the Guardians of the Galaxy; as a comic, at least the current batch. Maybe they’ll send Rocket to the 31st century for a bit and bring back the originals.”

Huh, could’ve sworn we had more of the Guardians over the last year, but it looks like the last Guardians comic was the annual in February. I’m sure I’m not remembering appearances of the Guardians (solo or together) in other comics, but it doesn’t look like there’s a new series for them in the near future, barring news I’ve not spotted. Oh, and as you read this a Doctor Doom and Rocket Raccoon one-shot should be on the stands at your better comic shops, or even mine.

“3. Some shoddy A.I. thing will be heralded as the savior of comics; maybe A.I. colors or letters or something. It’ll not only suck, it won’t even really be A.I, just super-outsourced.”

I’ve not seen anything from any legitimate publishers using A.I., far as I know. There was bit of a dust-up middle of last year regarding an artist possibly using A.I. for cover art. I feel like (or at least hope) anyone using A.I. to generate work would probably be shunned, shunned I say, so that’s a good incentive for someone in comics’ small pool to avoid it.

• • •

Bret comes this way with

“1. With the moderate success of the Blue Beetle movie, DC will revamp the Booster Gold character to make him more movie-friendly for a Blue and Gold team-up movie.”

Unfortunately, the Blue Beetle film actually didn’t do well at all, making just barely over its production budget, which doesn’t even count its promotional budget and so on. But it seems like a Booster Gold TV show may be in the works for streaming on Max. It looks like whatever they’ve done so far has been returned for regrooving, so it may be a while yet before we get any idea what it’ll be like.

“2. The success of Mark Waid’s pocket silver age universe of titles will lead Marvel to start their own pocket universe of titles (with more of an 80’s vibe) lead by the likes of Roger Stern and…buh buh buh…John Byrne!”

Not…as such. Marvel would occasionally do one-offs with ’80s and ’90s creators, and that Silver Surfer Rebirth was basically that. But not a whole lot of that in 2024, aside from facsimile reprints. Am I forgetting something? Maybe X-Men ’97, though that’s more a nostalgic call back to the cartoon than the comics.

“3. SECRET WARS III (12-part mini-series) by Jim Shooter and Mike Zeck. Nuff said.”

Would I read the hell out of this? Abso-freakin’-lutely. C’mon, Marvel, let’s get this going.

• • •

Snark Shark sorta predicted

“1) more Marvel movies will bomb.”

As noted previously, Madame Web and Kraven both died dogs’ deaths, as, like, everyone figured. Marvel Studios its own self only put out the one flick, and Deadpool/Wolverine made all the money.

“2) more DC movies will bomb.”

Also previously noted, Joker: Folie à Deux, DC’s only theatrical release for 2024 I believe, um, underperformed, shall we say.

“3) uh… i dunno.”

Me neither, Snark Shark. Me neither.

• • •

Thom H. hops on it with

“1. Nice House on the Lake vol. 2 is published or at least announced.”

Nice House by the Sea did indeed start coming out in 2024!

“2. Miracleman: Dark Age is put on hold indefinitely because Silver Age performed so poorly.”

Um…it’s probably on hold for now, but not for reasons of underperformance, shall we say.

“3. Tom King finally gets to write a Legion of Super-Heroes story.”

Not yet! Hey, might as well give the boy a shot…can’t hurt.

• • •

DK returns with

“It’s that time of year again….”

It just keeps comin’, DK.

“1) Kevin Feige gets fired or demoted.”

Nope, we still have Kevin Feige to kick around.

“2) There will be a big announcement of a major Justice Society project for the 85th Anniversary in 2025.”

Outside of a new ongoing series, I haven’t seen anything specifically for an anniversary celebration. I wouldn’t mind if they did a facsimile edition of this DC Special:


…but maybe throwing Hitler and a swastika on a cover right now may not be particularly wise. So maybe a facsimile of this digest (at normal comic book size, please) which reprints the story above, and more besides:


Anyhoo, I’d like to have all the digests reprinted in comic book size. DC Comics, you have your orders.

“3) Spider-Man sales drop noticeably.”

Sales actually went up a bit for me over the past year. Looking at Comichron sales appear to be relatively consistent overall, so it’s hanging in there!

• • •

Existentialman appears with

“1) Despite their high-falutin’ Hollywood lifestyles, Matt Fraction and Kelly Sue DeConnick will return to either Marvel or DC to write one limited series each.”

I…don’t think so? I’m sure I’m forgetting something. Let me know in the comments and I’ll update this entry. (By the way, doing a Google search on a woman comics creator always turns up some awful results.)

“2) A Disney+ Viv Vision television series will be announced in 2024 to premiere in 2025.”

Not yet, but give ’em time.

“3) Even with his past vision challenges, Mike will draw a much better capybara in 2024.”

this is like the third time you’ve asked me about my capybara drawing, and friend, I may never top this one from when I was five:


But the one I did for this post comes close.

• • •

Okay, Enuff Z’Nuff for today, so let’s continue our foray into the future via a year past on Friday, which is also in the future. …I’ve lost track of where I’m at. Anyway, thanks for reading, pals, and I’ll see you then.

Your 2024 Predictions, Part Two: Little Lost Lamb.

Back at it this week, checking to see just how you all did in regards to guessing how the past year in comics was going to go! Part one is here, and don’t forget to get in your predictions for 2025 while there’s still time!

So, awaaaaay we go:

Chris V visits us with

“1.)The X-Men revamp under Brevoort will be considered a major disappointment by most as Brevoort will choose very safe creative teams, no ‘critical darlings.’
Leading me to stop reading the X-Men comics for the first time since 1993, when I was in high school. I will not complain.”

I think, by and large, the Main Three X-titles (X-Men, Uncanny X-Men, and Exceptional X-Men are fairly well regarded by fans, particularly Uncanny as written by Gail Simone. In my opinion, launching three ongoing X-Men titles (not to mention, like, X-Factor and X-Force) all at once doesn’t really help or encourage readership (Exceptional is already slipping in sales for me, and X-Factor and X-Force are selling minimal numbers.)

It’s hard to say what would make a “safe” choice for an X-book…I mean, the aforementioned Simone is a fairly beloved writer, so in that way it’s “safe,” but I don’t think anyone expected her to be on an ongoing X-Men series, so that’s kind if a surprise, maybe. Unless you meant “people who normal write superhero comics” as being the safe choice, and, I don’t know, “Alan Moore returns to comics to write Uncanny” would be the “critical darling” choice. Not making fun or anything, just trying to define terms so we can determine how right you are with your prediction.

I think I’m going to say you were right i that these were safe choices, in that these were all people regularly writing comics and have proven track records. Not Huge Giants of Comics, like, say…ooh, there are a couple names I want to say here, but given the trouble they’ve been in of late, I don’t want to. You know who I’m talking about, people on that level. Or had been on that level, anyway.

As to whether you stopped reading X-books, Chris, I don’t know. I’m going to say…maybe you did? You’ll have to tell us!

“2.)All comics will be rising in price. Is this really a prediction in December 2023 though? Regular, monthly comics will be $4.99 (American), while ‘special issues’ will be $50 (OK, I might be exaggerating slightly on that last price).”

Some books are still holding the line at $3.99, but boy folks are getting really comfortable with slapping $4.99 and $5.99 and $6.99 price tags on things. And of course there’s the occasional $9.99 Special Issue! Oof. Anyway, I made my predictions for 2025 and didn’t realize I essentially duplicated this one. Urgh. It’s gonna happen eventually.

“3.)Kieron Gillen, Al Ewing, and Jonathan Hickman will all leave Marvel during 2024. Hickman ends up at DC. Gillen and Ewing will not.
This will cause me to lose interest in Marvel even more, and will still not increase my interest in DC. I will not complain.”

I think Hickman is still solidly at Marvel, and so is Al Ewing, though Ewing did have his Metamorpho series come out at the end of the year for DC, and it was announced he’s writing Absolute Green Lantern this coming year. Gillen I believe is still primarily Marvel and Image (and other indies).

• • •

William Gatevackes swings open with

“1. One comic company will get into the Taylor Swift business, most likely Marvel. It could be anything from creating a series featuring tales from her life to perhaps redesigning one of their characters to look like her, most likely Dazzler.”

I don’t know if any comic companies can afford Taylor Swift. And while I’m sure redesigning Dazzler to look like Taylor is tempting, I don’t think even Disney would want to tangle with her legal team.

There was a Little Golden Book about her, though!

“2. To the disdain of many of the unsavory elements of the comic fandom, a ‘woke’ comic will become a multimedia sensation, bring new readers into comics and get mainstream attention.”

Would the Absolute books count? The Superman one, especially. I think the greatest trick of them all is that said “unsavory types” probably read the book and don’t even realize it’s “woke” [complimentary]. “Wow, this comic where a family bucks the traditional class system, leading their son to fight for the little guy against the powers that be, is great! It’s so much better than one of those ‘woke’ comics!”

“3. Hollywood will wise up and finally make a biopic out of Jack Kirby’s life. It might not be released in 2024, but it will at least go into pre-production.”

Look, this has to be done while we still have Ray Wise in the acting business. Wise played Kirby for a TV show a while back, and HE IS THE MAN. I don’t think any biopic has been announced, but Hollywood is foolish if such a thing does not happen.

• • •

Sciencegiant is trying to kill me with

“They’re evergreen AND they’re softballs. Which means really they’re just a chance for you to riff on whatever you want to bring up.”

Well, these are more “Question Time“-esque post prompts than predictions, I think, Obviously all these things happen (and will also happen in 2025, natch), but I can probably come up with an example for each.

“1) WOW! That highly anticipated adaptation of fantasy/science fiction IP certainly underperformed at the box office/streaming service. I predict this is the death knell of of that genre/franchise.”

I mean, the easy answers are Madame Web and Kraven, but I’m pretty sure literally everyone except whoever’s running Sony knew those were DOA. I think the big shock is that Joker sequel…the first film made a billion bucks and won all kinds of awards. I mean, I’m sure no one thought the second film would do as well, but they probably thought it would do, y’know, at least reasonably okay given the performance of the previous installment. Certainly not that it would crash and burn in such an epic manner.

Anyway, that probably doesn’t kill the idea of Batman related films, but it definitely put the kibosh on musicual superhero movies, I think.

“2) SOB! The industry lost a great one whose like we will not soon see again. Any stories you care to share, Mike?”

I don’t want to single out any particular creator as being The Big One, because that’s not really fair to everyone. A lot of talents passed this past year, some after a very long life, some way too traggically young.

However, I do have a special fondness for Don Perlin, who passed in 2024 at the age of 94. I have an issue of Defenders a friend gave me, one guest-starring Man-Thing, that was signed by him.

“3) Fandom seems pleased/outraged about this latest reimagining. Your thoughts?”

Everything turning up Absolute Comics! And Ultimate Comics from Marvel, too, I guess!

“4) Good grief! Lucy pulled the football away on Charlie Brown AGAIN?!”

Hey, that’s four predictions! You have broken ape law! Anyway, Lucy and Charlie Brown are long dead, no one’s pulling footballs from anybody now.

• • •

Andrew Davison teaches us all with this

“Mike will try out my sartorial suggestions, a la Zatara, appearing in a short video blog to perform a variety of magic tricks.

“This video will become an Internet sensation, leading to a new career as a stage magician, headlining in Vegas by the end of the year.

“This will in turn trigger a multi-million dollar lawsuit from DC, and a movie offer from James Gunn.”

I…wait, what? Anyway, I don’t look good in a tophat. Besides, you all were lucky to get one video of my dumb face in a rumpled shirt here, I ain’t doin’ no magical tricks.

• • •

Dan Jack sez

“1. The mainstream publishers will continue to promote Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in their hiring and staffing”

Not sure that I’ve heard anything specific about this, but if they do, I hope then continue to do so. Especially now.

“2. More and more readers will abandon the above publishers.”

I presume you’re trying to draw a connection between Prediction #1 and this one. Sales do seem to be up, particularly with the advent of (here they are again) the Absolute and Ultimate lines. I know at my store comic sales are up across the board. I think things are okay with the Big Two right now…I’m more worried about the little guys and how the Diamond bankruptcy situation may affect them. Oh, and how tariffs may increase prices across the board. That’s more of a problem than supposed “diversity hires.”

“3. More crowdfunding/etc ventures will be successful, and remain un/under reported on by comics industry as a whole!”

In fairness I probably don’t mention these enough here, but I do occasionally go in for retailer bundles on some Kickstarters. I can’t do ’em all, but I try to pick the occasional one that sounds interesting. And it seems like I see them mentioned all the time, but maybe that’s mostly on social media. That’s where more people will see them anyway, I think, more than on my silly, ancient blog.

• • •

Cassandra Miller almost lives up to her name with

“1. Although there are continued allusions/cameos, the Legion of Superheroes gets neither a new book, nor an actual explanation of exactly which Legion is the ‘current’ one. Lots of contradictory cameos, is what I’m saying.”

Yeah, they’ve popped up once or twice, even an evil Anti-Legion in the DC All-In special. But not a whole lot really giving us what the Legion’s deal currently is, post Bendis-reboot. I really, really, really keep hoping we just get a World’s Finest-style Legion series by Mark Waid, since anything in the current DC Universe seems doomed to failure.

“2. Diamond files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and (hopefully) emerges a little stronger.”

Well, you were off by a couple of weeks, but Diamond did in fact do just that. Whether they come out of it stronger is something I expect we’ll find out in a few months.

“3. (This one is more a hope than a prediction.) DC realizes they should just put out a ‘Superman Family’ book, and refocuses the main Superman book as, well, mainly a Superman book.”

The Superman books seem to have cut back a little on the “here’s 15 different Super-characters” business, though they did play a part in that weekly Waid storyline, and we had a Supergirl back-up during that run. But what I wouldn’t give for a 1970s/1980s style Superman Family book. Gimme my solo Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen adventures! And we could have “Mr. and Mrs. Superman” without it being the Earth-2 characters! Make Jon Kent the lead feature, with various back ups, and we’d be set!

• • •

Okay, that’s it for now…your pal Mike has a medical thing in the morning, so he needs his beauty sleep. Yes, yes, I know, I’m already too beautiful, but sleeptime awaits. Thanks for reading, and we’ll get to more of your predictions next time!

Your 2024 Predictions, Part One: Fountain of Youth.

Okay, there’s been a couple of delays, but here we are, you’ve waited an for this very day, I’m certain, where we begin our look back at your comic industry predictions for 2024! Let’s see how we all did (and don’t forget to get in your predictions for 2025, which is already in progress).

And…this particular comments section had more than its fair share of excess discussion and jokey predictions and whatnot, that I’ll be skipping over this year. Sorry, just don’t have it in me this time. In the future 1) try to have some kind of specific prediction I can work with, and 2) try to keep it to just predictions in the comments sections to those posts, please.

First off is Customer Sean, with

“1. Both DC and Marvel will ramp up the number of facsimile editions being reprinted in 2024–bringing more classic Golden, Silver, and Bronze Age key stories to the readers at prices that won’t break the bank.”

Doing a search on Diamond for “facsimile” for 2023 versus 2024, there definitely were more results for the latter year than the former. (Diamond still has solicits for DC in its system, if you’re wondering.) Heavier on Silver and later, but some Golden Age did pop up as well. An interesting trend is doing facsimile editions of full series, as Marvel did with Marvel Super-Heroes Secret Wars, Boom! did with a reprint of Marvel’s Labyrinth adaptation, and DC did with Crisis on Infinite Earths) and just started with the original Batman “Hush” storyline. Can’t tell you how many times a #1 facsimile came out and I was asked for a #2 reprint as well.

“2. Mark Millar will succeed in revamping the comics industry.”

No revamping that I’ve noticed!

“3. James Gunn will announce a Challengers of the Unknown film featuring Cillian Murphy as Prof., Ryan Gosling as Ace, Tom Hardy as Rocky, and Harry Styles as Red.”

No, but I wonder if the Challs just aren’t flashy enough for a big budget comic book movie. I mean, I like ’em…every time they bring the team back in comics, I read it…but maybe moviemakers just want something…bigger? Obviously a good movie can be made out this, and I’m sure folks got movie pitches, but the Supermans and the Batmans get first dibs.

• • •

Chris Gumprich cashes in with

“1. Tom King will write a Black Label series that takes an obscure character, messes up their life, and ultimately kills the character.

2. Not specific enough? Okay fine, the character will be… Shade the Changing Man.”

King’s up to some shenanigans in Wonder Woman, but that’s not Black Label. Nothing quite on the scale as his Mister Miracle or his Adam Strange mini, at least. King is writing a mini with Black Canary, Best of the Best, but I don’t think it’s doing the same thing those other series did. And it feels like we’re due for a new Shade the Changing Man thing…the last was “Shade the Changing Girl/Woman” from the Young Animal imprint a few years back.

3. Archie will continue to milk the RIVERDALE dollars by doing a crossover comic with ‘Beverly Hills 90210.'”

(Hey look, I did a different Archie prediction this year!)”

Not really anything along the lines of its edgier TV cousin (unless you count the reprint of Betty and Me #16).

• • •

Pal Nat predicts

“1. DC will figure out how to push subscriptions for Christmas, and most but not all retailers will recognize this as seeding the comics market rather than stealing customers.”

Not that I saw. Do Marvel and DC even have subscription departments any more? I suppose they must. It would be a nightmare what with all the relaunches with new #1s.

“2. One of the big YA graphic novelists will drop an adult GN, the comics version of when Judy Blume released Wifey.”

I actually conferred with Nat on this one, and neither of us can think of any YA comickers making this specific transition. But, honestly, it’s just a matter of time, I’m sure.

“3. Comics will be said to be dying, still, as almost always.”

Ummmmmm, yeah…that’s always a thing, but it certainly got a boost of late.

• • •

Mike Loughlin drops this in

“The new era of X-Men comics, shepherded by Tom Breevort, will sell well at first but quickly lose fan enthusiasm due to its retrograde nature. Peach Momoko’s Ultimate X-Men will be a hit, for as long as she’s on the title.”

I would say that’s two predictions in there, but let’s cover the first one first.

Now, just based on my sales, Uncanny and Adjectiveless have dipped a tiny bit but remained strong, the other X-titles, including Exceptional, have stabilized at lower numbers. Which makes sense, since X-Men and Uncanny X-Men are the established names. We’re still within the first year of the relaunches, so let’s see where everything’s at by the time Year Two rolls around.

As far the Ultimate X-Men goes, yes, it’s still selling well, if not as much as the leader of the pack, Ultimate Spider-Man. I suppose that makes it a hit, as the people who like it really like it, but I’ve come across some folks who turn their noses up at it for not being a more traditional superhero comic (as much as the Ultimate books can be). Ah well, that’s how it goes.

• • •

Thanks for your patience as it took me a little extra bit to get started on this series of posts! Next Monday I’ll dive back in and continue the ride…well, probably!

BREAKING NEWS.

So I know I was going to start my 2024 prediction review today, but some stuff has turned up that takes some precedence, I think.

First off, Diamond Comic Distributors, Inc. has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In short, that’s allowing Diamond to reorganize and sell off assets to stabilize its business. Those assets include Alliance, the gaming distribution company, and Diamond UK.

And, as noted in the press release quoted at that link, their “main comic, toy, and collectible distribution lines” are also up for sale. Which sounds a whole lot like the company trying to keep things going until they can sell off everything and close its doors.

Or maybe they’ll get their act together and go back to business as usual. I have no idea.

Now, when there was a major collapse of comic distributors in the 1980s, a number of publishers were left being owed payments by said distributors. I imagine if Diamond goes away, the same may happen now, hurting especially the smaller publishers and possibly taking them down with them. Which is the main reason I’m hoping Diamond pulls through, not leaving those vendors holding the bag.

According to Diamond, business will continue as usual while they’re going through this process, including the weekly shipments, reorders, damage replacements, etc. Amusingly they emphasized the fact that yes, retailers with Diamond accounts are expected to keep paying their invoices, in case anyone thought they didn’t need to keep exchanging money for goods from a company in Chapter 11.

Diamond also informed retailers that they’re still supporting Free Comic Book Day for the year, at least as far as things look now. That leaves me to wondering, of course, who would take over the FCBD event should Diamond eschew the responsibility.

And that leads me to wondering just how Diamond can survive, and what may rise up in its place. I’m picturing a much pared down Diamond, carrying only comics, supplies, and maybe some comic related merchandise. No nudie books, no Japanese schoolgirl statues, no tchotchkes that have nothing to do with comics. Catalogs are 32 pages long, shipments all come from a single warehouse. It all depends on whatever comic publishers are left over, and if they get enough orders to keep Diamond’s doors open even at this minimal level. I feel like Dynamite and its multiple covers for everything would be doing the heavy lifting here.

If the comic distribution end does get sold to another company, then I guess I’d have to apply for an account there if the old accounts simply don’t transfer over. Would there be a gap in shipments caused by this? Possibly. The most convenient solution would be for one of the other existing distributors to the Direct Market (Lunar or Penguin Random House) were to take over the comics end of Diamond.

Otherwise, if Diamond just closes up shop, leaving publishers high and dry, then…well, I’m picturing the ’80s again, with a half-dozen distributors all carrying their own selection of items. Which is fine, if increasing the “paperwork” (or computer work, rather) at my end.

The very small press books are the ones that’ll be hardest hit, as a weird one-off book that’s easy for me to say “yes” to as a line item with everything else in the Diamond catalog, may get missed or overlooked entirely if they’re only available from some tiny distributor with not enough for me to bother opening an account.

Ideally, whatever happens my customers don’t see any problems from their end, that the comics continue coming out, regardless from where I get them. We’ll see how things shake out over the next few month.

Now, I’ve long ago transferred as much of my business as I could away from Diamond to other distributors. Diamond had just too many problems over the years…poor packing resulting in damaged comics, items being shorted entirely and not having the stock to replace them, getting a single copy of Comic Shop News instead of the full bundle (the most baffling shipping error). Getting alternative distributors was an outright relief, where (aside from a disastrous damage-ridden initial shipment from Penguin Random House) my shipments have been relatively damage-and-shortage free.

Since the advent of distribution competition, Diamond actually fixed most of these problems. Too little too late, I’m afraid. The vast bulk of my orders come from the other two distributors, with Diamond’s shipments being only a fraction of the size they used to be. The weekly payments to Diamond are so much smaller now than before, and I’d wonder “if everyone’s invoices shrunk this much, I wonder how Diamond is able to survive?” And, well…I guess I have that answer.

This is just a smattering of thoughts I’ve had on the topic. I’m sure I’ll throw more at you when I’ve had more time to process the situation, and as we experince the continuing ramifications.

• • •

The other big news of the week is this article (may be paywalled, but you can find other articles covering its contents) with its in-depth look at the sexual assault claims against Neil Gaiman. WARNING: the descriptions therein are very explicit and upsetting, so you may be better off finding someone else’s summary.

This situation is very disappointing and disillusioning, to hear that such a talented force admired by so many is an alleged creep credibly accused by multiple victims. And it doesn’t help that Gaiman’s own statement, posted on his official site just yesterday, smacks of the same meaningless platitudes that Warren Ellis threw out there when he was outed as a sex pest.

“Innocent until proven guilty,” I know, and Gaiman claims his relationships with all these women were consensual. But…man, this doesn’t look good for him. Even Scott McCloud, who had a longtime friendly relationship with the man, is like “hoo boy.”

I’ve written before about the possible impact on the comics publishing end, which now seems like an inevitability. DC’s challenge is divorcing the Sandman franchise from its creator, and Marvel’s challenge of wrapping up Miracleman, while on a much smaller and less impactful scale, is still one they have to face.

But like I said then, this is the least of the issues at stake here. It’s an ugly situation, leaving some very hurt women in its wake, and one hopes some justice may be found here.

My apologies…

…but if you’re seeing this message, then your pal Mike decided that he was too beat after a two-day sidewalk sale at his store to put together a proper post.

The first part of our look back at the 2024 comic industry predictions, originally planned for today, will be up on Wednesday.

Thanks as always for reading.

Wolverine Back Issue Talk, Part Eight: Okay, Grownups. It’s Beer O’Clock.

Okay, finally wrapping up what was going to be a two-part series with part eight, because if it’s one thing your pal Mike knows how to do, it’s run off at the mouth keyboard.

First, let’s go back to the comment that inspired this Final Chapter, from Mike Loughlin:

“…I’m curious if the painted Mark Texiera covers on the first Sabretooth mini drive back issue sales. Ditto the BWS or Sam Kieth Marvel Comics Presents covers.”

Well, well, well, Sabretooth:


…the series I kept buying out of collections until I realized its sales heyday was a couple of decades back and nobody is looking for it anymore, at least in these parts. I mean, they sell occasionally, but my clientele just isn’t Sabretooth-crazy (judging by my sales on the most recent issue).

I will sau, at least the die-cut gimmick on this cover is less obnoxious than the one on Wolverine #50. Using the ol’ “Three Claws” ranking system, as seen in the New York Times and as used by movie reviewers across the nation, I’ll give this Sabretooth mini One Claw…not a big seller, mostly forgotten by God and man.

As for Marvel Comics Presents, the long-running anthology title…well, Sam Kieth covers definitely moved the books during that period when he was a “hot” artist. My particular favorites are the front and back covers for #100 from 1992:


Don’t worry, folks, Wolverine is going to be okay, thanks to his adamantium-laced bones and his mutant healing factor!

Now, I still do get demand for both 1) Marvel Comics Presents issues, and 2) Sam Kieth art, but oddly not specifically Marvel Comics Presents covers by Sam Kieth. Which is a little weird. That said, they do still sell…much more slowly than they used to, and not for much, but folks seem happy when they spot them. One Claw, bordering on Two, for this ranking.

Now as for the Barry Windsor-Smith issues:


…which reveals a heretofore unseen chapter in Wolverine’s history, is always in demand, and I suspect always will be, so long as Wolverine remains a popular character amongst you funnybook fans. Even folks just poking through the back issue bins and come across these covers, knowing nothing of the story within, are compelled to buy these. The cover I posted above is one that’s particularly popular.

They are not as in-demand as they were when we were closer in time to their release, but they remain consistent sellers. I’d give this the coveted Three Claw ranking.

There are a couple other oddball things, like Iron Fist #15 from 1977, cover art by Dave Cockrum:


…featuring Wolverine in Sabretooth’s costume, you’ll notice. This issue (and the issue previous, with Sabretooth’s first appearance) are in huge demand, and probably will continue to be. Three Claws it is!

And here’s this sorta awkward Wolverine cover from Daredevil #196 (1983) by Klaus Janson:


Used to be quite the hot ticket, but, I don’t know, maybe local demand’s been saturated? They don’t sell like they used to. May a Two Claw ranking?

And just because they need to be noted, the very definition of Three Claw rankers in my ridiculous scale that I used in all these posts and will likely never use again…Wolverine’s first full-length appearance in 1974’s Incredible Hulk #181:


…with brief appearances in both #180 and #182. Art on the cover by Wolverine’s creators Herb Trimpe and John Romita Sr., written by the other creator of Wolverine, Len Wein, inside.

Then from 1988, one of the most iconic Wolverine images of all time, from Incredible Hulk #340, art by Todd McFarlane:


I mean, just look at that pic. Clearly McFarlane peaked with this and never did anything else of note.

And, that’s that for Wolverine Back Issue Talk. Look, I know I left out a whole bunch of stuff…there are a couple of prime covers on Uncanny X-Men I probably could have noted, but right now there’s enormous demand for any Uncanny X-Men pre-multiple reboots. Pointing out a Wolverine-centric issue or cover from that series as a “good seller” doesn’t really make any sense when they’re all good sellers right now.

So anyway, philfromgermany, I hope that answers your question.

• • •

Next week, I’m starting in on your 2024 comic industry predictions, and I’ll see how we all did! Plus, get in those predictions for 2025…we’re almost halfway through January, what’cha waitin’ for?

Wolverine Back Issue Talk, Part Seven: It’s Your Play, Hero. I’m Waitin’.

Here we are, the next-to-last (honest!) installment of “Which o’them Wolvie back issues are still sought out now, and possibly in the future?” Again, I may not cover every issue of Wolverine that you think may be of note, and if you think of any others, feel free to drop ’em in the comments.

So anyway, let’s start up with Wolverine #145, an extree-sized 25th anniversary issue with a cover by Leinil Yu
and Dexter Vines:


…with foil-enhanced claws on the cover of the “deluxe” edition. The big event in this issue is the restoration of the adamantium stripped out of his skeleton way back in 1993. Wow, you know, I don’t think I ever really thought about the fact that the “bone claw” version of Wolverine lasted six years. Huh.

As such, this is an expanded issue, it’s got a cool gimmick on the cover, it’s a Big Change (or rather, reverting a change0 for the character…all incentives for boosting interest and sales in this issue. I’d say it’s a Three Claw rank, using my nigh-infallible method of ranking these Wolverine comics, with “One Claw” being your typical box filler, and “Three Claws” being books that fly out of the door, now and possibly for the rest of time.

Now, these next two issues are interesting, featuring covers and interior art by Mr. Robert Liefeld, Esq. — issues #154 and #155 from the far-flung future year of 2000:


The initial reason these were in high demand, at least for us, was that Liefeld factor. Doing a couple of X-books in his post-Youngblood phase grabbed the attention of fans, making these comics popular sellers both new off the rack and out of the back issue bins.

Now, as the years have worn on — 25 of those years, in fact — Liefeld’s presence on these comics has become less of a sales motivator vs. the fact that Deadpool is in these stories. But, for whatever reason, sell they do, and at somewhat of a premium to boot. Again, I’m going with the Three Claws ranking for these two, though sales in the future will depend on whether Deadpool retains his allure or folks burn out on him again.

Here’s bit of an oddball one, #160 from 2001, art by J.H. Williams III and Mick Gray:


I mean, I suppose there are J.H. Williams III completists out there, snapping up copies of these. But look, I’ve been selling comic books for a long time, and I know when folks are pickin’ up specific issues because of the ladies on the covers. Nothing wrong with that, not yucking anyone’s yum, it’s perfectly okay to want to see Wolverine fight a couple of attractive hitwomen or whatever. And that is an eyecatching cover.

Those characters’ names, by the way? T & A. …Oh, come on.

Anyhoo, this comic is a pretty consistent seller…not a top tier back issue, nobody’s busting down my doors demanding it, but it’ll sell when it’s spotted. Gonna give this one the rank of Two Claws — you heard it here first.

For the finale of our little Walk Down Wolverine Lane (at least for the Wolverine series itself), here’s #165 (2001), cover art by Sean Chen and Norm Rapmund:


That’s definitely an eye-catcher! I seem to recall at the time there was some…apprehension in regards to the cover and to the violent content of this specific issue. Strangely enough, the event presented on the cover is less explicit inside, happening in shadow:


The mild controversy of course attracted sales, and this was in pretty good demand for some time, but I think that’s all forgotten now. When it sells today, it’s probably more for the “whoa, that cover” feeling. A defnite Two-Claw book.

That’s that…those have been the issues of the original Wolverine ongoing series that attract back issue sales now, and may (or may not) continue to get them in the future. Like I said above, I’m sure this wasn’t everything, and if you think I missed a big one from this run of books, leave it in the comments. Despite all my talk about wrapping this topic up, I can always return to it for some addendums later. I’m not proud.

Tune in Friday for the end of this (current) run of posts, as I look at few Wolverine appearances in other comics and what that did for current/back issue sales!

Wolverine Back Issue Talk, Part Six: Am I Supposed to Be Impressed?

Okay, I’m really hoping to finish Wolverine Back Issue Talk this week, since next week I’m going to start on covering the 2024 comic industry predictions you made a year ago. Which reminds me, get your predictions in for this year soon, before too much of this year slips by!

So, on to this new batch of Wolvie issues…just click on the “Wolverine” category link to see more, since I’ve been too lazy to create a tag just for these Back Issue Talk posts.

Note: since this is wrapping up this week, I’m skipping a few here and there (like those post-adamantium-removal stories right after #75), most of which are solid sellers, more so than some of the other issues in the run. “Two Claw” rankers, using my system here. If I miss any you think are notable, feel free to say so in the comments!

First up is Wolverine #88 from 1994, cover by Adam Kubert:


Chris V in the comments beat me to it, but yes, I was definitely going to mention this issue in regards to its early Deadpool appearance.

This had a sudden bump in demand, going from “forgotten filler back issue of Wolverine to Hot Commodity in very short order. Yes, I’ve had copies of these relatively recently. And yes, they just fly out the door. I forget now what I had ’em priced at…probably closer to $50 than $100, using Chris V’s price range, but given how fast they sell maybe I should start nudging those numbers slightly upward.

Anyway, using the trademarked/patented/copyright-ened Three Claws system for Wolverine Back Issue Hotness, I’ll give this the mighty Three Claws rank. Always in high demand. always sells. At least as long as Deadpool is a hot character and/or supplies of this issue remain relatively difficult to come by.

Now here’s an interesting one…Wolverine #90 (1995) with a wraparound cover by Adam Kubert and the Hildebrandt Brothers:


This was the last issue of the series prior to it being replaced in the schedule for four months by the Age of Apocalypse alternate-timeline event mini-series Weapon X.

The wraparound cover is obviously a big selling point, as is the Wolverine/Sabretooth battle. Of particular note is the cliffhanger ending, where the story leaves off with Wolverine apparently springing one of his claws through Sabretooth’s head. And, like I said, this story was interrupted for a few months, feeding into fan curiosity and demand, leaving folks wondering just what the repercussions of this battle were going to be.

Now, thirty years later, that several month gap is no longer a factor, as anyone interested can just pick up the following issues out of the bins, no waiting, no fuss, no muss. Regardless, this issue remains in high demand, and likely will for the foreseeable future. Another Three Claw-er, sez me.

The final issue for today is issue #100 from 1996, with art by that Adam Kubert guy again, with inks by John Dell:


Yes, it came in a couple of flavors, with that hologram cover above, and sans hologram below:


It’s one of those extra-sized Big Round Number anniversary comics, always a plus in back issue demand, and the large splashy hologram certainly helps it move. The cover lacking the hologram also sells well, so lacking the cover gimmick doesn’t hurt its potential.

This is a status-quo-changing story, featuring Apocalypse (another popular X-Men villain) mucking about with Wolvie, resulting in him becoming a more savage and bestial creature for the next few issues, so as the beginning of sorts of a new storyline, that probably helped fan interest, too. Nowadays, though, it’s the double-whammy of being issue #100 and sometimes having the hologram that pushes sales. And sell it does…I’m calling this another Three-Claw Classic.

• • •

So, like I said, I do want to wrap this up this week, so next time I might cover a few more issues in the main Wolverine series proper, then touch on some other Wolverine-adjacent comics that always sell, or used to at any rate. Yes, I’ll probably mention those Hulk issues.

Anyway, thanks for reading, and I’ll see you folks on Wednesday.

What, him worry?

So a few decades back, I started to participate in the local computer bulletin board (or BBS) scene. This is what we had before general qccess to the internet, and an alternative to larger commercial enterprises like Prodigy, Compuserve, and AOL. Hobbyists would set up BBS software on their own computers, and with a dedicated phone line or two to allow users to dial in with their own computers and modems to participate in message boards, play games, download the “warez,” what have you.

It was a fun activity and a creative outlet, and on at least one of these BBSes I ran a dedicated section for comics discussion. This was very early in my comics retail career (or “career”) and several folks on these BBSes were, in fact, customers of mine. It was usually a fun, friendly endeavor and I’m still friends with a number of people from then to this day.

And I say “usually” because there was this one guy — isn’t there always — who was a real fly in the ointment. Going by the appropriate name of “Bozo” (appropriate not in the Larry Harmon way, but in the more derogatory sense), this person would rant and cajole and insult with misspelled screeds and usually unwarranted venom. Hostile and homophobic, it was a wonder to me why he spent his time doing this in paces where folks were just trying to have a little fun and relax. (It was also a wonder to me, in retrospect, why he wasn’t immediately kicked off these BBSes…perhaps he was from some, but he certainly seemed to be around a lot.) I tangled with him once or twice, and quickly realized both the futility of this and that this was exactly what he wanted, so I stopped.

This outsized toxic personality had me wondering…just who was this guy? And it wasn’t like today, where some jerk can pop up out of nowhere and he’s, like, on the other side of the world from you. This was probably someone at least relatively nearby, calling into the boards to wreak his havoc. I pictured some cranky dude in his 40s (I was in my 20s at the time) in his stained t-shirt banging at his keyboard surrounded by empty cans of whatever his poison of choice may have been, smoker’s-cough laughing at his latest bon mots.

One thing about these being local BBSes is that there would occasionally be in-person gatherings, at a park or bowling alley or places like that, where we meet face-to-face instead of just typing words at each other. And it was at one of these gatherings that “Bozo” turned up.

And what surprised me was that…he was about my age, possibly younger. A handsome guy, appeared to be completely congenial in person, even perhaps a little sheepish to stand revealed as “that guy.” Though I was a relative newcomer to the BBS scene compared to many of the others at these gatherings, and they seemed to be familiar if not friendly with the fella. As if it were necessary to have a “troll” on the BBSes and this was they guy who happened to take up the job, and, y’know, no hard feelings.

I never did get any actual insight into what “Bozo” thought he was doing, whether this was some form of extended performance art or if he actually bought into all the madness he was spouting. Anyway, it didn’t matter because by the mid-late-ish ’90s the local BBS scene had largely collapsed, as the internet began to expand access and lured users away. And “Bozo” because an artifact of the past, a weird memory from a mostly positive pastime.

But then I was on the internet, where there were plenty more “Bozos” to be had.

I was not a Usenet guy, the message exchange system that primarily dominated early internet usage before the advent of the World Wide Web, but yes, I know trolling was a problem there too. And of course there were all the dedicated message boards on the Web, with their own problematic trolls, but I mostly avoided those as well. But I didn’t really peronally encounter trolling again until blogs began to really be a thing. Especially after I started my own blog.

To be fair, I haven’t had to deal with many over the couple of decades of doing this site. There are the occasional drive-by commenters, who only turn up once to say something insulting to me because they disagreed with whatever. I had a couple of recurring trolls (one of which followed me over from the old Fanboy Rampage blog) who would shout nonsense in my comments sections ’til they tired of it, or I blocked them. I still have one dude who pops up whenever I suggest that maybe people who aren’t white and straight should be treated as humans, to tell me the error of my ways.

But “jerks is jerks,” I guess, and running a site that allows public commenting is alas opening a door for people to do this sort of thing, and that’s just the price paid.

And, hoo boy, there’s social media of course, which is just a madhouse filled with confirmed social deviants just itching to pile abuse onto someone who made the mistake of being, say, a woman. Little different from “Bozo,” they just cast out their hooks and see who they can catch.

A slight variation I’ve encountered more recently on the usual trolling is “the super fan,” someone who is extremely possessive of their specific obsession. So much so, that someone else discussing that obsession in a way they don’t personally approve of is to be attacked and diminished in favor of their superior perspective.

One example that continually amuses me is when blogging brother Andrew and I were on Xwitter discussing (WARNING: old people video game references incoming) Coleco’s game releases for the Atari 2600. We’d referenced the fact that many of these games were ports from the more advanced Colecovision, and by pure necessity had to be downgraded to be able to perform on the 2600’s older hardware.

We weren’t denigrating Coleco for this, we weren’t cast aspersions on the people who made these games…we were simply acknowledging the literally undeniable fact that the 2600 games had to less complex than their Colecovision counterparts. The hardware and memory differences demanded it.

Well, well, well, the world’s #1 Colecovision fan somehow found our discussion and injected himself right in there, outraged that we would call these games incompetent trash (we didn’t) and that we’d insult the programmers’ knowhow (we also didn’t). The point of object seemed to be the word “downgraded,” which we meant entirely dispassionately and he thought was an offense of the highest order.

Andrew just blocked the guy right away, which was the wise move, though I think it was my years in retail that made me attempt to reason with the guy and get him to see what we were saying. Because I’m talking about it here, you can probably guess that didn’t work out, even to the point where the guy actually tried to tattle on us to some old former Coleco programmer who also happened to be on Xwitter. (I never saw that programmer make a comment, presumably because he probably rolled his eyes and thought “ugh, this guy again.”)

Since I’ve abandoned Xwitter and moved to Bluesky, I haven’t had to deal with too many problem people, and those that turn up are very easily dismissed with Bluesky’s very solid blocking option. However, there was one case just the other week, one that inspired this very post.

On the occasion of President Jimmy Carter’s passing, I posted this MAD cover, dated March 1978:


Along with it, I included the caption “This was as defining an image of Jimmy Carter for me in my childhood as just about anything else. RIP.” You can see the post right here for yourself.

This wasn’t intended as an overtly political post (even if posting about a former President at all is inherently political). It was simply a comment on the fact that, as a child at the time, my primary interaction with politics on that scale was via entertainment aimed at me (or not necessarily at me, but seen by me anyway, such as Dan Aykroyd’s impression of Carter on Saturday Night Live). To this day, this drawing (by Jack Rickard) exists in my brain as the primary picture in my mind of the man. I mean, they don’t call these the “formative years” for nothing.

I figured, if I were to get any objection to this post at all, it’d be from someone who was annoyed that I didn’t discuss Carter’s full legacy, good and/or ill, or that I reduced him to this goofy image. And I was ready to argue, if I had to, with, well, what I said in the previous paragraph.

What I got instead was this, a straight up objection to me even using MAD at all. You can see my immediate response, and his, um, whatever that is in the image, too:


Not shown is my second response, where I told him 1) I’ve discussed MAD plenty of times on my comics blog, with its own category, and 2) I carry MAD in my store, both new issues and old. And as you can see by his second response, he did see that post and it did nuttin’ a’tall to mollify the guy. So, to Blocktown he went.

Digging a little deeper into the fella, I discovered he was on several Bluesky “blocklists” (lists which, if you follow, block everyone on that list) which tells me this isn’t unusual behavior for him. And a fellow blogger has told me he’s turned up in their comments whenever he uses images from MAD for the same reasons “Alfred” gives above…not liking comic book guys who talk about his favorite magazine.

It’s…amazing that someone puts this much vitriol into complaining about something that, let’s face it, isn’t real. Or at least aimed at the wrong people, to give him the barest benefit of a doubt. As online pal ThisIsBrian said, “That sure is a lot of worrying for a guy who’s using the name of the most famous non-worrier there is.”

Compared to the abuse some folks get online, this is nothing. Some trolls out there can be real dangers, with threats and massive online pile-ons of their victims and showing intentions of (and following through with) real world crimes. The guys I’ve mentioned here are just minor annoyances, bemusing at best, and easily dealt with. They aren’t much different from the “Bozos” of yore, spitting out anger and insults, just more specific about their particular triggers. I’m betting that in person, they’re also just like “Bozo,” unassuming and bearing sheepish grins when outed for their behavior, their rage curtailed in fear of actual consequences.

Take us with you, Buck!


Happy New Year to those who celebrate, and let’s hope (really hope) that 2025 turns out better than we’re expecting. Be good to each other.