Blogging about blog templates is a sin.

Okay, I finally got around to posting some responses in the comments thread to my “event comics” novella. Your thoughts are, as always, very interesting and informative, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. And I would also like a little more information about this whole “Tony Stark invented a machine to make the world forget he was Iron Man” business. Honestly?

Now, about the site’s new look…I’d been itching for a change on this site for a while now, wanting to replace that banner with an image that ties into the funnybook world a little more than the old one did. I also changed the background graphic, in case you hadn’t noticed, but I’m still playing around with that.

Judging from the few reactions I’ve seen, at least a few of you like that new logo, and I like it, too…I mean, it does have Swamp Thing in it, after all. However, I may be crossing that “fair use” line a bit. It’s one thing to have panels and covers and such in my posts, since I suppose that technically could be considered usage for review and commentary. Using a copyrighted character as part of my own identifying logo…well, maybe that’s pushing my luck a bit. (Though it hasn’t stopped these guys.) I may leave it up for a while, and change it to something a little less infringing in the near future.

I also need to add more “since 1969” taglines…I’m sure some of you are getting sick of seeing the same ones over and over.

Anyway, just in case you were curious, here’s the original photo I used for my initial logo, taken by my girlfriend while she was visiting family in Mexico:


Just stretched it out, slapped some monospaced text on it, and olé, instant logo.

Go team.

Anyway, thank you for your responses to my long, rambling post yesterday. I know it was an obvious point I was making, that the hyped “big changes” in event series rarely stick, but one of the side effects of being at a comic shop with a lot of back issues is that you can see all those crossovers and tie-ins and spin-offs and “changes” of past comic company events and just how much of a real impact most of them had. I’m not down on any of these events, really, so long as they’re entertaining (and at least some of them were entertaining).

Anyway, when I have more time (I’m in bit of a time crunch this morning) I’ll get to some direct responses to some of your comments. In the meantime, Bill at Trusty Plinko Stick has further thoughts on the topic, and brings up Stan Lee’s “illusion of change” storytelling strategy that I had mentioned in my post, but edited out. Yes, I actually cut something from my manifesto, hard as it may be to believe.


I’d like to bid a fond farewell to Scott Saavedra’s Comic Book Heaven weblog, as he’s decided to put an end to it. I’ve noted several times before that the print edition of Comic Book Heaven was one of the inspirations for the direction of my site, what with all the looking at oddities of comics past and such. Scott, consider this my vote for the return of the magazine!

The Secret Crisis of Infinite Wars.

A few days ago, I was paging through some early issues of Marvel Age at the shop, reawakening those nostalgic feelings for the magazine that I’d noted before. For only a quarter (or thirty-five cents, or fifty cents, or…well, you get the idea) you got a 32-page full-color comic filled with previews of coming events, sketch pages, interviews, promo art…sure, it was full-on hype for Marvel product, and technically you were paying for 32 pages of ads, but you knew what you were getting. It was an unabashed house organ, but you got some fun cartoons from Fred Hembeck in a bunch of issues, some of the back-cover calendar gags were amusing, and you got plenty of creator interviews…not deep, meaningful stuff (well, except maybe for the Hembeck cartoons), but overall it was a fun little mag, and what the heck, it was cheap. Well, for a while, at least.

Anyway, I was looking at issue #12 of Marvel Age, reading the hype for the then-forthcoming Marvel Super-Heroes Secret Wars crossover mini-series, when I came across this paragraph:

“This monumental adventure figures importantly in the continuity of nearly every single Marvel title. Events in this maxi-series will permanently and shockingly alter the histories of everyone from Captain America to the X-Men to Spider-Man! No matter who your favorite Marvel hero or villain is, you’ll find yourself absorbed in THE SECRET WARS to stay on top of the catastrophic changes in that superstar’s life!”

Of course, as most of you know, the changes weren’t quite as dramatic as the hype would have had you believe. Hulk broke his leg (lasted a couple months), She-Hulk joined the Fantastic Four (around for a couple years), and…did something happen to Captain America? I don’t remember. I think Colossus and Kitty Pryde broke up because of events in this series, maybe. And of course there was Spider-Man’s new black costume, probably the only lasting impact the series has had, though the evolution of that costume into his arch-nemesis Venom was more after the fact than because of anything in Secret Wars itself.

Marvel took some grief from fans and the fan press about the hyped changes that ended up being no real big deal, and when it came time to push Secret Wars II in Marvel Age #27 (June ’85), writer/editor-in-chief Jim Shooter took the opportunity to do a little back-pedaling:

“You know, a lot of fuss was made about ‘The Big Changes in Secret Wars!’ And the fact is that change was not the point of Secret Wars. It was never the point. I don’t know how the talk started because here at Marvel, we always have changes. […] So the fact that in the twelve issues that made up the saga of Secret Wars there were significant events in the heroes and villains’ lives, considering how many issues there were, how could there not be changes?”

Most of these company-wide crossover series seem to promise big changes, new characters, new directions, permanent alterations in the status quo…and a few years, or even a few months, later, it’s as if nothing at all had happened, particularly if you’ve had yet another crossover series in the meantime.

Probably the only significant change at Marvel or DC that had its origin in a crossover series was from DC’s Crisis on Infinite Earths, which changed the very structure of DC’s shared universe by doing away with the decades-old multiple-Earth concept. Whether that was a good change or bad, I’ll let you decide, since twenty years on we’re still dealing with the repercussions of that series.

Crossover series also kill off or retire characters, which doesn’t matter because they’re usually revived or replaced with a new character with the same name sooner or later. Supergirl died in Crisis…and was replaced with a new Supergirl a couple years later (who was herself replaced with yet another Supergirl, just recently, with an origin similar to the original, but now showing more skin). To address more recent events, a while back I joked about Sue Dibny: Rebirth and Blue Beetle: Rebirth, reviving characters killed off in the most recent spate of DC’s crossover events…but all it takes is an editorial change and some new, hot writer who decides he really wants those characters back in the land of the living, and, surprise, there they are, as if nothing had ever happened to them.

New characters and titles are usually launched out of these events as well…DC’s Bloodlines and one year’s worth of Marvel Comics annuals introduced a whole boatload of new characters, most of which disappeared in short order (Hitman being Bloodline‘s big exception, though even that character has run its course). Most of these relaunches don’t last, unless it’s with an already established character (like The Flash or Wonder Woman). Again, to go back to Infinite Crisis…while Checkmate and the new version of Blue Beetle may be entertaining, chances are they won’t be around five years from now. But then, most new titles from Marvel and DC don’t last five years.

I know there are others…we got a good run of Starman out of Zero Hour, for example, though it too had run its course. But basically, this is why I don’t worry overly much about all the “significant changes” and promises that “things will never be the same.” Things may change for a while, but they’ll change back sooner or later. And if you don’t care for something unpleasant that was done to a character you like (for example, Wonder Woman having to break the neck of a bad guy), don’t worry…in short order it’ll be as if it never happened at all. How often is Superman’s execution of three Kryptonian criminals brought up nowadays? At the time, people were pissed…I bet at least a few of you reading this now have no idea what I’m referring to.

Let’s look again at Infinite Crisis. Did DC promise big changes because of this series? Yeah, probably, I don’t remember and don’t feel like looking up all the hype. I’m sure you all read it anyway. But what changes are we getting? Relaunched Wonder Woman, Flash, and Justice League comics, which would have happened anyway even without crossover events, since DC wouldn’t let those names languish for too long. Superboy is dead, and depending on the repercussions of recent legal decisions some Superboy or another will probably be back. Superman doesn’t have his super powers for the time being, which of course isn’t a permanent state of affairs. IC feels more like “course correction,” attempting to reintroduce and revitalize some of the characters and concepts in the DC Universe, rather than changing things wholesale.

I know I primarily discussed DC’s current events above, but all that applies to Marvel, too, in their four or five big event comics they’re currently running. Did I read correctly, that a Marvel character will have his secret identity revealed to the world during the course of Civil War? I’m guessing Spider-Man, since it would seem like a bigger deal for that character than for, say, Iron Man…and I don’t know if there are any other characters at Marvel where it would be a big deal. If so, someday someone at Marvel may decide that wasn’t a good idea, and cook up a storyline where, say, Dr. Strange casts a spell to make everyone forget Spider-Man’s secret. There, big change reverted, status quo successfully maintained.

So that was a long row to hoe basically to say “I don’t believe ‘big change’ comic book hype.” Just give me some good comics to read out of these events, that’s all I ask.


Nothing to do with the topic just discussed, but this amused me: in Marvel Age #12, Stan Lee (or a close approximation) writes about his work on a ’50s humor magazine:

“Years ago, about the time that Mad magazine was a’borning, yours truly produced a similar publication called Snafu.”

Phrased like that, it makes it sound as if Snafu simply simultaneously arose with Mad out of the same cultural zeitgeist that drove the need for new sources of parody and satire. But looking at the dates involved — Mad preceding Snafu by about three years — it becomes clear that Snafu came about for the same reasons all those other ’50s humor magazines did: the need to rip off the incredibly successful Mad. Yeah, I know: “What? Marvel copied someone else’s successful idea? The devil you say!”

"How can I computulate if my computotron isn’t working?"


The Flash and his pal, Slippy the Ghostly Condom, want you to practice safe sex or get zapped by their de-erectifier gun. SO WRAP THAT PACKAGE BEFORE DELIVERY, BOYS.

(Found at this auction on the eBay by my personal manservant, pal JP)


Mighty Jaime Hernandez begins his run in the New York Times Magazine. He’s a good guy, and deserves all the attention that this is certain to bring him. It’s in that PDF format that seems to annoy everybody, but read it anyway.


Some interesting thoughts regarding religion and perceptions of the afterlife in the DC universe may be found in the comments section from my post yesterday. Would regular appearances of angels and devils in the DCU, not to mention superheroes regularly travelling to Heaven and Hell, strengthen religious belief (“See, it’s all true, so you better believe”) or undermine it (“Ah, angels and devils are just alien beings, like Superman, so big whoop”)?


For no good reason whatsoever, aside from the fact it came up at the store on Saturday: a web page about one of the favorite TV shows of a five-year-old Mikester: Run, Joe, Run.

It’s a live action kids’ show about a dog, a German Shepherd, on the run from the law, pursued for a crime he didn’t commit. In the process, Joe would encounter a different person each week who would need his help…help would be provided, and he’d move on to another town, one step ahead of The Man.

Hey, I was five. It was The Perfect Show for a five-year-old. Doggies!


“Comic capers coming soon”

“Having read a few recent stories regarding “V for Vendetta,” it’s become clear that some of my movie-reviewing colleagues don’t know the difference between a graphic novel and a trade-paperback collection.

“So here’s a quick tutorial:”

Read the article for the definitions, if you are so inclined.


If you’ve been having trouble posting comments here (and perhaps on other Haloscan-driven comment forms), like at least one person has reported to me, and I’ve even experienced here myself…going into your browser’s preferences and clearing out the Haloscan cookies seems to correct the issue.

Speaking of computer problems, some internet connection issues I was having on the job caused me to utter that very declaration in the subject line for this post up there. I’m not sure why, either.

Because I can’t get enough of the "Death of Superman," it seems.

That image to the right is taken from this auction…apparently an actual granite tombstone, used as a promotional item for the “Death of Superman” storyline. I honestly have never heard of such a thing. Please note this bit from the auction’s description: “BOTTOM 4 INCHES OF THE TOMBSTONE IN [sic] STAINED FROM BEING LEFT ON THE GROUND(OUTDOORS).” Goodness.

While trying to Google up more information about this item, I found someone who produced his own out of styrofoam (along with a reproduction of the “tattered cape” image).

I think I’ve noted before on this site that, shortly after the original black-bagged “Death of Superman” issue (Superman #75) was released, there was a lot of panic buying and hugely inflated prices taking advantage of said panic buying. $200 was the craziest price I heard, and this was less than a week after the comic had sold out. Nowadays we regularly sell sealed copies for $18 a pop (which is the highest we’ve ever priced this particular book, which surprises some people when I tell them this). Looking at auctions on the eBay, copies tend to sell between $5 and $20, though there is the occasional person with high hopes.

This item isn’t specifically a “Death of Superman” tie-in, but any auction with the title “SUPERMAN BLOODY DEATH BLOOD DRIPPING DC SHIRT” deserves special attention. However, there was an official “Death of Superman” t-shirt, as I’m sure most of you recall, featuring that tasteful red bloody “S” from the bag covering Superman #75, printed against a black background. I still see people wearing them around town on occasion…whether they’re original owners or just picked them up in one of our many fine local thrift stores, I’m not sure.

There was another t-shirt design, one showing superheroes carrying Supes’ coffin. You know, the more I think about that superhero pallbearers shirt, the tackier it seems. Good Lord, people wore this. The other thing I remember about that shirt is that the image was taken from the poster that came with Superman #75, and Batman was one of the pallbearers*. Due to licensing issues, Batman was replaced by Captain Marvel for the t-shirt design (and, I believe, when that image was used in the tie-in trading card set).

And dig that belt buckle.

* Wouldn’t having Batman as one of the pallbearers at a very public funeral service put lie to to the “Batman is an urban legend/public doesn’t know if he’s real” editorial direction the character had been under for a while? Of course, the scene on the poster doesn’t occur in the comics themselves, so I guess that was their “out.”

President Linkin’.

Okay, let’s ignore the fact that the title of this auction has one of my eBay pet peeves (the “not superman” aside, which is just keyword spamming), but just what is this guy selling?

“This auction is for a Spiderman trading card
You will get a FREE Custom made Spiderman 3 Costume Replica
Size Medium
The BLACK SUIT
(w/ detachable mask)”


Is it for a trading card featuring the costume? Is it for the costume and a trading card? Is it for a card that’s a contest entry for this costume?

I do like this bit of the description: “Size small – medium (toby meguire size)”

Here’s someone else who tried to sell his replica costume…apparently similar to the one being sold in that first auction, since it uses pretty much the same description and images (save for the “trading card” business).

Don’t ask how I ending up looking at Spider-Man replica costumes on the eBay.


Via Johanna: TwoMorrows is offering one free magazine per customer on their website during Free Comic Book Day. Like Johanna says…perhaps they’re missing the point a bit about getting bodies into stores on May 6th, but, hey, free magazines! And maybe it’ll get folks into stores for future issues.


Article on comic book convention emphasizes slow death of medium:

“But the move toward Hollywood, while putting money into the industry, also distances people from the comics, making it possible to forget where the ideas, moral themes, plot lines and intricate characters were first developed.

“We see kids now who know all the characters inside and out, and we ask them, ‘So you read the book?’ And they say, ‘No, I watch the cartoon,'” said [Ron] Frenz.”


This article from 1997 features the single most threatening image of Spider-Man I’ve ever seen.


More balloons…Batman style.


Jon Stewart reads The Decider comic book on The Daily Show. (embedded Quicktime link, via Robot Wisdom) (EDIT: Missed that Neilalien beat me to it)


“DC Comics taking over theaters”

“Speaking of X-Men, the producers of those movies have been talking about doing Metal Men. Metal Men is a DC property that tells the stories of a ragtag team of superhero robots and their inventor who all face prejudice and fight evil.”


“Spiderman [sic] visits Benjamin on his 3rd Birthday”

In which Mike complains a lot, but ends on an up note.

So, between my mentions of “gay sex” and “topless Adrienne Barbeau” over the last couple of days, I should be getting some interesting Google searches in my referral logs, I imagine.

And I would correct the title of this post to reflect the most likely reason why that dialogue balloon was cut, but I don’t particularly want the kind of Google searches that word would bring me.


New comics day…feh:

I’m sure you all remember the glory that is…Rob Liefeld’s Captain America:


This has been held up as the real nadir of questionable anatomy from the height of the Image Comics-era (and you can see more about it at, appropriately enough, Grotesque Anatomy). However, I think we have a new contender from this week’s Wolverine: Origin #1:


You can go to this Newsarama article for a better look, if you dare. It’s quite admirable, really, how Wolvie overcame his hunchback disability to become a superhero.

LET THE GRIPE-FEST CONTINUE:

The Superman in the 80s trade paperback starts off well, with the two-part “Return of Jonathan Kent” storyline, a particular favorite of mine, from back in the days when Supes’ adoptive parents were dead. However, the three part storyline from DC Comics Presents which introduces Mongul is represented only by the third installment, guest-starring the Spectre. Shame, really, since that run (also featuring the Martian Manhunter and Supergirl) is a good’un, and well deserving of a full reprinting. And while, yes, the early post-Crisis Superman comics were from the ’80s, I would have liked to have seen more pre-Crisis stuff in this book. Isn’t DC in the process of reprinting most of that post-Crisis Superman stuff in chronological order, anyway?

I understand the financial considerations involved in moving from publishing semi-quarterly mags to online strips and trade paperbacks, but still, some of our customers balked at buying the new $20 Girl Genius book to get the 1/4 of it that’s new material. I love the Girl Genius stuff, but man, that’s frustrating. (I imagine it’s frustrating for the Foglios, too.)

Apparently, this isn’t a new American Splendor book, even though the most prominent feature on the cover is the American Splendor logo.

Red Sonja #9/Stargate SG-1 Ra Reborn Prequel/everything from Avatar/et al – I realize that publishing multiple covers of every single issue is pretty much the only way to inflate your orders to somewhat more reasonable levels (particularly with the threat of Diamond dropping titles that don’t reach a certain level of profitability), but, honestly, it’s getting to be a drag.

And whom do I have to bribe to get Serenity trade paperbacks in stock? They finally showed up in Diamond’s stock listings a few weeks ago, I put in my reorder…and they were put on back order, which was eventually cancelled. I tried again a couple weeks later, got the order confirmed, and they were on the invoice for this week…and they didn’t show up. A note from the distributor indicated that they didn’t have enough copies to go around, and that replacement copies should arrive next week. I’ll believe it when I see it. I imagine in a few months, once nobody cares about Serenity anymore and Borders and Barnes & Noble return all their copies, I’ll be able to get as many copies as I want. Or have I said that before? Probably. Seems to happen every time something hits it big (or even “cult big,” like Serenity) in the “real” world, outside the comics industry.


“Okay, Mike, did you like anything this week?”

Yes…yes, I did. Little Lulu Vol. 9 – Lucky Lulu. She can totally kick that wimp Goku‘s ass.


Speaking of kicking ass, Fearless Fred Hembeck has a swell Swamp Thing cover repo currently up on the eBay. I can’t swing it…alas, still recovering from recent expenditures, but I’m sure one of you fine folks can give it a good home. I mean, just look at it!

No gay sex* for you.

Found by employee Nathan…from Outsiders #30:


From today’s release of the Outsiders: Crisis Intervention trade paperback:

* EDIT: My mistake…there’s still plenty of gay sex in this book!

No.


NO.


NO.

NO.


(Found here, here, and here, respectively.)

Also, it’s interesting the things being sold as “old” on the eBay, like “Old Image Youngblood Comic Books,” or 35 Old DC Vertigo Comic Books,” or Comico Jonny Quest comics, or an issue of Young Indiana Jones Chronicles, or an “Old Rare Uncanny X-Men” #307, some Disney Comics-era books along with an out-of-date price guide, ten random issues of Quasar…all of these have the word “old” in their auction titles. Okay, maybe they are from a decade or so back, but is that really “old?”

Or maybe it’s just my thing about having any comic younger than me being described as “old.” I’m sure I have a grey hair or two that popped in upon hearing younger customers pull up an issue of, say Fury of Firestorm, and declaring “Wow! This comic is from 1986…boy, is that old!”

I did it…for science!

So when the original version of the Swamp Thing DVD was released, and then pulled off the market due to a parent’s complaint (look under May 7-8 for details EDIT: link no bueno, sorry), I thought it was primarily for the accidentally-included footage of some topless dancers that appear late in the film, in a scene that was trimmed from the PG-rated theatrical release and initial video release.

However, in online reviews of the DVD, listings on the eBay, and whatnot, people kept saying over and over again “THIS IS THE VERSION WITH THE ADRIENNE BARBEAU NUDE SCENE THAT GOT IT PULLED FROM THE SHELVES,” or words to that effect. And I kept thinking, “No, that’s not the reason…the original version of the film had that nude scene with Adrienne Barbeau. ‘Twas the topless dancers what did the deed.”

Finally, after seeing the nude Adrienne Barbeau claim over and over and over again, I dug deep into the Mikester Video Archives and found my copy of Swamp Thing on VHS, and, strictly for the purpose of setting the record straight on this important matter, sought out the infamous Barbeau swamp-bathing scene to compare it to the same scene on my copy of the DVD.

First, I should note that the actual quality of the transfer really suffers when compared to DVD. It’s hard to believe we put with with such crummy reproduction and “pan ‘n’ scan” for so long. Second, I’ve been spoiled by DVD chapter stops…actually having to (gasp) fast-forward a video cassette is so…primitive. This must be how our caveman ancestors watched television.

As it turns out, all those online reviewers and eBay sellers were correct…the nuditivity in question involving Adrienne Barbeau is far more, well, full-frontal, and much longer in duration, in the DVD version than the video version. For example, there are more shots of Barbeau posing like this:


Alas, if you want that scene in its full glory, along with the topless dancers, you are at the mercy of online auctions, since the first edition of the DVD has been replaced with a version featuring the original theatrical cut.

So there you go…I hope that was educational and enlightening.


In other news:

As I noted to a few online friends over the weekend regarding this story: “pop eats itself.” The CSI comics are going the route of Marvel’s Alf and Mighty Mouse comics, by explicitly gearing the comic to the people who are actually buying it, i.e. people who are already comic book fans, rather than futilely trying to tap the non-comic-reading audience that watches the TV shows.

I may be overstating it a bit…I’m sure the CSI comics must have grabbed a few fans of the show who don’t otherwise read funnybooks. I know I’ve sold a couple to such people. However, it must be frustrating to have a comic book license to a popular TV show, and to have the print runs of the comic hover around 1% of the TV show’s audience. You’d think it’d be like printing money, with a million CSI fans rushing to their local comic shops with cash in hand, eager to seek out new adventures of their favorite characters.

But it doesn’t happen, since most of those people don’t want comics. There are a number of CSI prose novels, too…I wonder if these are selling as well as their publisher hoped. In this age of immediate DVD releases of TV shows, and movies too, the fanbase’s need to seek out additional tie-in stories has greatly diminished, a point I’ve made before.


Okay, that was bit of a downer. Sorry about that. Here, have an out-of-work Hulk:

(EDIT: Sorry, the video is also out of work, and lost to memory.)


If you learn just one thing from this video, let that lesson be “don’t have Hulk as your golf caddy.”