One tough Gazookus wot hates all Palookas.

§ October 16th, 2024 § Filed under eyeball, popeye, question time § 8 Comments

More of your questions, more of my answers!

ExistentialMan gets down to earth with

You’ve mentioned your comic reading backlog (and unfortunate eye challenges) several times over the years. I’m curious if you have a system for how you tackle your stacks of books. Do you just read them in the order you placed ’em in the longbox? Selectively choose back issues that relate to current titles? Toss a random dart at the stack? Please enlighten us.

For those of you new to the site, what EM is referring to is the fact I’ve had some vision issues in relation to actual physical problems with my eyeballs, discussed enough here that the topic has its own category.

Now, the eyeball situation has mostly stabilized, though I’m still getting treatments (i.e. the dreaded injections) in the left eye about once every couple of months…a vast improvement over getting shots in both eyes every month like I had been at the beginning. And I haven’t had a vision-obscuring bleeding incident in my eyes for quite some time now. So, you know, good news all around.

My vision is diminished from what it was, requiring glasses now. And though I no longer need the regular treatment on my right eye, the vision in that eye is impaired. I can see out of it, but not at the…resolution, I guess, as I can with my left eye, which is mostly at normal when using said glasses.

Anyway, as mentioned by EM, my reading had been slowed down a bit, after about an 18-month period at the beginning of all this when I read virtually nothing. When I did start reading again, it was slow going as I adjusted to my new vision status quo, and between bouts of eye-bleeds that would prevent me from reading again.

One result is that I gave up entirely on reading comics for a while, even during those periods when I could do so. I watched a lot of TV instead, which, thanks to a big ol’ flatscreen, was much easier for me to see than small print on paper pages. I was still picking up the comics I wanted to read, but setting them aside for a later date.

And that later date has been the last couple of years or so, as I’ve been making a stronger attempt at catching up on the backlog. I’ve adjusted to my vision, I’ve got a reading lamp that helps quite a bit, so I’ve been making some progress.

When I started to try catching up, my priority was the stuff I was reading on a serialized monthly basis. Gathering together all the Superman stuff, the Hulk stuff, so on and so forth, and reading through them a series at the time. Then, as new books come out, I read those as I get ’em and I stay caught up on those series.

Then there are the one-shots and the miscellaneous minis that have come out over the years, that got backlogged and I get to those as I find the time. There are probably still some of those DC/Hanna Barbera specials I haven’t read yet. But I’m getting through them as I can.

The real roadblocks are the magazines and the graphic novels/trades. I don’t get every issue of Back Issue, but about one out of every three issues or so there’s one stuffed with articles I want to read (“special DC Comics 1980s mini-series issue!” — DAMMIT) and I’ll pull it aside and I think I’m years behind on those and really need to stop picking them up. But then this month they had an issue about DC’s horror comics and DAMMIT.

Graphic novels, 100 to 200 or more pages a throw there, take a lot longer for me to plow through, but lately I’ve been trying to put more effort into reading them. For example, not long ago I finally read Matt Wagner’s newly expanded Grendel: Devil by the Deed, about a year after its release.

Now it’s not like I’m just talking home piles and piles of books every week. I have made an active effort to keep my personal pulls to a minimum, as I try to find a balance amongst 1) what new stuff I really want to read, 2) what I have time to read, and 3) how much backlog I still need to whittle down.

This isn’t even counting all the regular prose books I need to catch up on. I just read Opposable Thumbs, a book about the history of film critics Gene Siskel, Roger Ebert, and their partnership, and it took me like a year to get to that.

• • •

Adam Farrar gets up close and personal with

“I’ve never read any of the original Popeye comics. But I’m missing out, yeah? My library has the six volumes from Fantagraphics. Should I try to find the pre-Popeye Thimble Theater strips to read first?”

Adam, Adam, Adam…how dare you come here, into my very own website, without having read any Popeye. Friend, run, do not walk, to that library and get those volumes into your hands. If it’s closed when you show up, break in. Do not delay feeding Popeye into your peepers any longer than you already have.

You do not need to read the earlier Thimble Theater strips. The first of those Fantagraphics volumes contain several non-Popeye TT strips, kicking off that storyline and eventually leading to Popeye’s introduction. That should give you enough of the taste as to what those early strips were like.

Should you ever decide to continue beyond those Fantagraphics reprints once you’ve caught Popeye fever, maybe you can try some Thimble Theater (available in very large and expensive, but nice, hardcovers). Or you can look at a bunch of the facsimile editions IDW published of 1940s-50s Popeye comics by Segar’s successor Bud Sagendorf, which can be found in single issue or collected form. there were also a couple volumes reprinting Bobbly London’s run on the strip from the late ’80s/early ’90s.

There’s a current Popeye comic, Eye Lie Popeye, done in a nigh-anime style that’s a little off-model from the original strips, maybe, but still a lot of fun.

But read those Segar comics! And always remember what Popeye says about cartoonists:

8 Responses to “One tough Gazookus wot hates all Palookas.”

  • Thelonious_Nick says:

    To my mind, Segar’s Popeye and Schultz’s Peanuts are about the height of comicking. Maybe toss in Sergio.

    The E.C. Segar Popeye strips should be taught in high schools across the country. I’m not sure there’s ever been a better combination of humor and adventure on the comics page.

  • Thom H. says:

    I didn’t think a lot about classic comic strips until I read How to Read Nancy a couple of years ago. Now I feel like there’s a whole world I’m missing out on.

  • ExistentialMan says:

    Mike, thanks for the detailed answer (and for taking our questions in the first place).

    Glad you’re getting caught up on that backlog!

  • Cassandra Miller says:

    I’d add Caniff’s Terry and the Pirates to that list. An absolute master class in writing, long term plotting, and storytelling. Not to mention the art!

  • Sean Mageean says:

    @ Cassandra Miller

    Agreed. I’d add in Wash Tubs and Captain Easy by Roy Crane; Prince Valient by Hal Foster; and Flash Gordon by Alex Raymond.

  • Sean Mageean says:

    *Wash Tubbs

    *Prince Valiant

    So, I guess Popeye would defeat Joe Palooka in a fight–but could he do it without spinach…?

  • Adam Farrar says:

    Alright, you’ve convinced me! Thanks, Mike!

  • Snark Shark says:

    “Back Issue, but about one out of every three issues or …and I think I’m years behind on those”.

    It took me literal YEARS to read all of the issues I had piled up, and I’d stopped buying it regularly a couple of years ago.

    “I just read Opposable Thumbs, a book about the history of film critics Gene Siskel, Roger Ebert”.

    Cool! I MISS those guys.

    ” Segar’s Popeye and Schultz’s Peanuts are about the height of comicking. Maybe toss in Sergio.”

    POGO!!

  • Leave a Reply